Annotation of dvb-kernel/SubmittingPatches, revision 1.1
1.1 ! js 1: Please submit patches to the DVB driver to the linux-dvb mailing list,
! 2: http://linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo.
! 3:
! 4: For info on preparing the patches, please read the file
! 5: linux/Documentation/SubmittingPatches, which is distributed
! 6: with the kernel sources.
! 7:
! 8: *****************************************************************
! 9: Especially we request that you sign off your patches
! 10: according to the "Developer's Certificate of Origin" with
! 11: a Signed-off-by: line (see linux/Documentation/SubmittingPatches).
! 12: *****************************************************************
! 13:
! 14: For developers with CVS commit access it is required to add
! 15: a Signed-off-by: line to the CVS commit message. It would
! 16: also be nice to keep in mind when writing the CVS commit
! 17: messages that we will use them later when forwarding
! 18: the patches for inclusion into Linus' kernel, so they
! 19: will end up in the kernel changelog.
! 20:
! 21: A side effect of the Signed-off-by: line is that you
! 22: will get automatic mail notifcation when your patches
! 23: are submitted to lkml and accepted into the kernel
! 24: (thanks to http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/quilt).
! 25:
! 26:
! 27: 2005-05-10 Johannes Stezenbach <js@linuxtv.org>
! 28: ---
! 29:
! 30: http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/5/10/38
! 31:
! 32: Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 02:16:45 -0700
! 33: From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
! 34: To: Johannes Stezenbach <js@linuxtv.org>
! 35: Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
! 36:
! 37: Johannes Stezenbach <js@linuxtv.org> wrote:
! 38: >
! 39: > > In future, please try to gather Signed-off-by: lines for these
! 40: > > contributions, thanks.
! 41: >
! 42: > How should we handle this with CVS? Should people add a
! 43: > Signed-off-by: line to the CVS commit log?
! 44:
! 45: That sounds reasonable.
! 46:
! 47: > If they don't,
! 48: > can I assume that "by policy" the Signed-off-by: line for
! 49: > the committer is implicit?
! 50:
! 51: I wouldn't do that. S-O-B does imply that they have read, agreed to and
! 52: complied with the "Developer's Certificate of Origin" from
! 53: Documentation/SubmittingPatches. That is not a thing which person A should
! 54: be asserting on person B's behalf.
! 55:
! 56: > Or do I have to bug them to
! 57: > mail me the Signed-off-by: line?
! 58:
! 59: Yes please.
LinuxTV legacy CVS <linuxtv.org/cvs>