tzap does perform better but still not brilliant based on the < BER ... wondering where to go next with all this ? On Sun, 2003-06-08 at 18:15, michal wrote: > No, you are wrong. Broken stream was taken with dvbstream without > parameter -ps. No demux was done. Because it is easier to detect errors > in transport stream... > > Really don't know why tzap is better ;) Is it now OK or only better? > What shows tzap? > > Michal > > > The difference is that 'ts2ps' is doing the demux (not szap) whereas > > dvbstream would do it internally.. > > > > I've never had problems with the output from dvbstream.. but... there > > you go :) > > > > gdh > > > > > > > -- // --[ UxBoD ]-- // 2.4.20-gentoo-r5 // Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.53GHz // // gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 56ED1CB5 //
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part