Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
As I am no coding expert, I just give the gcc error:Marcel Wiesweg wrote:Am Sonntag, 25. April 2004 12:23 schrieb Prakash K. Cheemplavam:Hi, I just tried to make a quick compilation fix for gcc3.4. I am not sure, whether the fixes are right, so please take a look and then merge. It compiles, but I have not done a test-run.Here is another tested suggestion. The first is a matter of taste - in their changelog however, the propose to use "this->" for members of dependent base classes in dependent classes.I have to admit that I don't quite understand where the problem is here. Why doesn't T *l = (T *)First(); work any more? After all, there is no other item named "First" anywhere near. What am I missing? Klaus