[linux-dvb] Re: CA_ZAP/DVB libs
Andrew de Quincey
adq_dvb at lidskialf.net
Thu Jul 7 19:54:02 CEST 2005
On Thursday 07 July 2005 18:09, Manu Abraham wrote:
> Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> > Well here is my opinion:
> > Should we have "one library to rule them all", or split it into seperate
> > sublibraries? Having seperate libraries is cleaner architecturally, but
> > might be overkill... anyone have any really good arguments either way?
> Having sublibraries will keep confusion to an utmost maximum,
I assume you mean minimum here :)
> and will
> be helpful in extending the same at a later stage in any aspect, if
> required. IMHO this would be advantageous..
> For example the main issue that i had initially to go with ca_zap from
> scratch was based upon the same idea. Tomorrow is somebody needs to do
> xyz, it should provide expandability for the same, rather than a tightly
> integrated infrastructure.
Yeah, makes sense to me.
More information about the linux-dvb