[linux-dvb] tda1004x update

Michael Krufky mkrufky at m1k.net
Tue Nov 8 00:52:39 CET 2005


Hartmut Hackmann wrote:

> Michael Krufky wrote:
>
>> Hartmut Hackmann wrote:
>>
>>> I just committed an update of the tda1004x dvb-t driver to the 
>>> dvb-kernel
>>> CVS. It only affects the tda10046 (hopefully):
>>>
>>> - fixed oddities at firmware download from eeprom.
>>> - more tolerant vs crystal frequency offset. It should now work with up
>>>   to -/+100ppm deviation. This can be the cause why some boards like
>>>   the Lifeview just didn't work for some users.
>>> - lower sampling clock to 48Mhz for low IF and 53MHz for 36MHz. 
>>> Together
>>>   with some other minor changes, this increases the sensitivity a bit.
>>> - doesn't touch the GPIOs any longer. This needs to be handled by the
>>>   board layer.
>>>
>>> The latter change might cause incompatibilities. However, it is 
>>> necessary
>>> since the pins are used very differently. I could not find problems 
>>> with
>>> boards i have access to. 
>>
>> What is the status of the testings with this patch?  Your 
>> announcement mentions some possible incompatabilities...
>>
>> Mauro has already send your v4l patches to -mm... Do they depend on 
>> this one?
>
> I haven't heard anything but few reports that it gave the slight 
> performance
> improvement i expected.
> I tested with 4 different cards: Lifeview, Philips Tiger and Europa 
> and the
> Medion. The Philips cards are at least compatible with the Compro and 
> the ASUS.
> I can get hands on one other important card in short term.
> So there is quite some test coverage.
> The GPIO thing can cause trouble with modern hybrid cards like the 
> ASUS which
> need proper handling of the GPIOs.
>
> Hermann, can you roll back the tda1004x driver to see whether the old 
> version
> works with your card?
>
> This went a bit fast. I didn't expect that Mauro would update the patches
> again...
>
> Hartmut

Hartmut-

Hmmm.... I do agree that Mauro might have sent the v4l patches too 
quickly to -mm... However, -mm itself is somewhat of a testing area.

If I understand it correctly, the patches in v4l are only adding dvb 
support, and will not break anything unrelated.  Is this correct?

If that is correct, then it is okay for Mauro to have sent them.  Now, I 
need to know from you whether the corresponding dvb patch to tda1004x 
should also be sent to -mm?  IIRC, the patch that Mauro sent to -mm 
might depend on this dvb patch.  If so, let me know, and I'll send it to 
akpm.

Unless, of course, you think it has the potential to break other 
boards.  In which case, let Mauro know and he can have akpm drop it from 
-mm until it can get some more testing in cvs.

-Mike



More information about the linux-dvb mailing list