[linux-dvb] [PATCH] Multi protocol support (stage #1)
abraham.manu at gmail.com
Thu Apr 27 18:08:47 CEST 2006
Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006, Manu Abraham wrote:
>> Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
>>> The kernel now requires gcc-3.x, so you could use anonymous unions if
>>> you want.
>>> But you repeat the same mistake which we already made: No room
>>> for future binary compitable extension :-(
>> What's your thought on removing the size field in the IOCTL, so that the
>> size won't be an issue ?
>> That way it will be binary compatible. :-) Or any other thoughts you
>> have ? We can retain the size for now, but we can remove it as and when
>> need arises ..
> - old binaries would have less memory allocated than the
> kernel wants to read -> boom
> - dvb_usercopy wouldn't work
> It's far better to add "u8 pad;" to the union.
> (or some other arbitrary number instead of 256)
:-) Sounds fine.
More information about the linux-dvb