[linux-dvb] DiB3000MC rewritten and MT2060 is ready to go into
main
matthieu castet
castet.matthieu at free.fr
Wed Aug 16 19:06:08 CEST 2006
Hi,
matthieu castet wrote:
> matthieu castet wrote:
>
>> castet.matthieu at free.fr wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Selon Patrick Boettcher <patrick.boettcher at desy.de>:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Might be a mistake: Do you say that when you convert the data from
>>>> the old
>>>> buffer to the new agc-structure it works better? Otherwise I don't
>>>> see why
>>>> it changed.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I didn't try that yet. I wanted first to know your opinion on it.
>>>
>>> I will try it this evening.
>>>
>> No it still doesn't help :(
>> As I don't have a datasheet nor a knowlege of the driver, I don't know
>> what to try.
>>
>> With your mt2060 dongle, don't you see a signal strength loose between
>> old driver (with patched signal strength report) and new driver ?
>>
>> Can't you attenuate your reception quality in order to check if you
>> see the same behaviour ?
>>
>>
> I found a bug in the mt2060, the VGAG wasn't set to a correct level.
>
> Now I get the signal level from the old driver, but there still no
> picture...
>
> The rate of the dvb stream reported by femon (from vdr is very low) :
> 0.5 Mb/s instead of 5 Mb/s.
>
Any news on that ?
The new driver is broken for me (no picture, no autosearch) while the
old driver was working.
The new driver is now integrated in the hg repo, but it seems a big
regression for configuration like mine (ok there weren't mt2060 support,
but it could have been added without rewriting the driver).
Shouldn't we have to wait a new driver with no regression before merging
it ?
I hope it will be fixed before it hits linus git repo.
Matthieu
More information about the linux-dvb
mailing list