[linux-dvb] Re: Hybrid tuner proposal (V4L/DVB)
abraham.manu at gmail.com
Mon Apr 16 06:59:09 CEST 2007
Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> [big snip]
> C'mon guys, let's leave the past behind us and
> not start fighting again.
I am removing a CC to unnecessarily avoid a flame. That opinion has been
expressed quite a lot.
> I believe many people ("users") would like em28xx to be merged
> asap, so I'm trying to find a way how it could be done.
IMHO, code that which is bad should be fixed and then only be accepted
into the project. I don't see any reason for any person/project to be
given any special status and things should work just as normally.
It is completely wrong to artificially create a huge importance/need
and doing things -- Incorrect way of doing things.
> It is unfortunate that em28xx depends on the hybrid tuner
> API design, but we have to live with it.
em28xx is just a normal USB bridge chip. xc3028 is a simple tuner that
has supports analog mode
>> On 4/10/07, Manu Abraham <abraham.manu at gmail.com> wrote:
> If that proposal is _proven to work_ ("dummy_hybrid_tuner.c" doesn't
> sound like it's been tested), _and_ has more supporters than
> Markus' code, then I would ask him to rebase his code
> on top of it. However, I don't think we should wait
> another month for your proposal to be ready.
> So currently I think if Markus code _works_, and
> _doesn't break_ any non-em28xx/xc3028 devices, then it
> should be merged.
> But of course that requires that people test his
> stuff with non-em28xx equipment, and report if it still works.
> (And ideally someone who read through the code would
> ACK it or let us know why it can't be ACKed.)
> You or someone else can rewrite the whole hybrid tuner
> stuff later once you have a proven better solution.
> I don't care and I guess Markus wouldn't mind, too.
I have sent another mail on another thread, please do read that post and
the relevant links and please do mention why you think it would work
More information about the linux-dvb