hi all
hi
hverkuil already said he won't be joining us today. Not sure about pinchartl and sailus
mchehab: should https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg151508.html go through the media tree? Not sure if it should be Acked or accepted.
if it were just dt stuff, acked-by would be the right way
but it contains change at sunxi-cir.c
yes
what patch does it touch it?
drivers/media/rc/sunxi-cir.c
@@ -319,6 +319,7 @@ static int sunxi_ir_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 static const struct of_device_id sunxi_ir_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-ir", },
 	{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a13-ir", },
+	{ .compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ir", },
 	{},
patch 2 touches
if the changes are just like that, I'm perfectly fine on letting it be merged via DT tree
it introduces some quirks here: https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/56377/
I don't have any strong preference
I guess the point is: do you expect merging conflicts with such changes on your tree?
the changes look fine to me and I don't expect merging conflicts
I don't have any preference
ok. IMO, merging via DT seems to be safer
as only two patches touch media; the rest touches generic stuff from DT
So would that require your Acked-by: or should I ack it? I've looked at the patches and they look fine to me.
that may also be touched by other patches
the better is if you give your ack
I'll then give mine too
ok. Thank you.
just replying to patch 00/12 should be enough
from my side, thanks to a hverkuil's collegue, we now have patches to port patchwork to a newer version...
applying them will be a challenge, though...
basically, I can't test the migration patches on Fedora
because the patchwork version we have doesn't work with Django 1.11