↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |
Who | What | When |
---|---|---|
mchehab | hverkuil: yes, although not sure what to do with that one...
did it get acks from akpm or other mm maintainers? sailus: I need the emails for Antti Laakso and Tuukka Toivonen for the MC summit report bbiab | [10:17] |
hverkuil | mchehab: yes, it has all the acks.
(akpm's Ack) so it can be merged for 4.3. | [10:23] |
.......... (idle for 47mn) | ||
mchehab | ok | [11:11] |
......................... (idle for 2h1mn) | ||
*** | stormer' changes his alias to stormer | [13:12] |
mchehab | hverkuil, pinchartl, sailus, larsc: just sent a draft for the MC workshop report
it is based on the notes we took on etherpad, and that I sent to the ML on July, 31 just after the event @sub-maintainers: please check your patch queues. I should be reviewing the last patches for 4.2 this weekend or on next Monday hverkuil: see Christoph Hellwig's DMA patch series... does them conflict with your git pull request? | [13:16] |
hmm... changes are all inside arch stuff
mchehab wanders if, after those patches, USERPTR will properly work with saa7134 | [13:29] | |
.... (idle for 15mn) | ||
btw, this is what's pending for review, per sub-maintainer (patches up to yesterday):pinchartl: 133, hverkuil: 96, lyakh: 49, kdebski: 16, snarocki: 10, sailus: 9, hdegoede: 1 | [13:45] | |
.... (idle for 19mn) | ||
lyakh | mchehab: those are probably numbers from the patchwork, I think the real number is much lower. Indeed, I had no time for patch reviewing / pushing since like 4 weeks and will have no time this coming weekend either. Only the weekend after that hopefully | [14:04] |
hverkuil | mchehab: 1) Christoph's patch series is an RFC series (as per his cover letter), 2) it's not conflicting since Jan Kara's patches do not touch the scatterlist at all.
mchehab: most of my patchwork patches are for RFC series that need more work. I'll take a look at the remainder on Friday. mchehab: for kdebski's patches: mail him with a CC to me: he should reassign patches to me if he can't review them. | [14:07] |
mchehab | lyakh: yeah, some of those patches may already be merged/superseded
the next week's weekend is likely too late for 4.2, except if something bad happens during the next -rc release | [14:14] |
lyakh | so, my stuff will have to wait until 4.3 | [14:15] |
mchehab | hverkuil: yes, it is RFC
err... I meant 4.3... the material for 4.2 was sent 7 weeks ago ;) the next merge window is for 4.3 | [14:16] |
lyakh | yep, 4.4 then:) | [14:20] |
mchehab | hverkuil: email for kdebski sent | [14:21] |
shuah | mchehab: just shared the media graph for au0828 and ALSA MC work to the Tech topic thread.
getting close to sending updates after our review at the summit | [14:28] |
...... (idle for 28mn) | ||
mchehab | ok
shuah: please review the MC summit report... I'm also adding an html copy for it at: http://blogs.s-osg.org/?p=1702&preview=true but I prefer if you can reply to the email hmm.. didn't notice that we're at the public channel... the blog entry won't be visible yet for the others my plan is to publish it at linuxtv.org/news.php either on Friday or during this weekend... after having review from hverkuil, shuah, larsc, sailus and pinchartl | [14:58] |
hverkuil | mchehab: I plan to review it on Friday. | [15:03] |
mchehab | good enough for me | [15:03] |
shuah: I'm not sure if your email will go to KS ML
because it contains an embedded image (at least, I'm not seeing here on my KS inbox) | [15:17] | |
stormer | hverkuil: someone poste a (too big) patch to gst to expose the timecode, but I notice that the spec is not giving much details about what a timecode is suppose to correlate with, so you have pointers about what it is suppose to represent ? what it can be used for ? or is this there and used in a "proprietary" way ? | [15:20] |
hverkuil | stormer: it really isn't used at all. It's old and there are no drivers that ever fill it in. m2m drivers are expected to copy it, but that's all.
I don't know when and for what it was introduced. | [15:22] |
stormer | I thought they where expected to copy the timestamp, didn't know the timecode too
(it's also second precision, so can't believe it's really useful) hverkuil: I'm probably right to ask why he wants to know this information, it could easily be a miss-used of the v4l2 api in his driver | [15:23] |
hverkuil | Looking at it I suspect it might be intended for embedded timecodes in SDTV video.
I know that that can be embedded in the vertical blanking. | [15:24] |
stormer | like this ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertical_interval_timecode | [15:24] |
hverkuil | yeah.
But such data should come in through the vbi device. | [15:25] |
stormer | wow, I can't believe someone in 2015 would be writing a v4l2 driver of a tape reader .... | [15:27] |
hverkuil | Well, apparently nobody ever does, because there are no drivers that actually use it.
We've been wondering whether it should just be removed, or marked deprecated or whatever. I wouldn't add support for it to gstreamer, unless someone has a really good use-case. | [15:27] |
stormer | ah, it's more precise then I thought, as it's (hours, minutes, seconds) + n-frames
anyway, thanks hverkuil: I'll make sure to gather all the requires information before considering then, reporter was " Dimitrios Katsaros <patcherwork@gmail.com>", if anyone knows him ... | [15:30] |
hverkuil | BTW, if he has a good case for using this, please let us know. I'd be interested. | [15:31] |
....... (idle for 31mn) | ||
shuah | mchehab: yes it didn't make it yet - I will upload the picture to my google drive and give a link - resending the message. | [16:02] |
stormer | hverkuil: ok | [16:05] |
..... (idle for 23mn) | ||
*** | Parker_ changes his alias to ParkerR_ | [16:28] |
...... (idle for 25mn) | ||
shuah | mchehab: ack on reviewing the summit notes. Will get it done in a day or two | [16:53] |
↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |