<!-- Some styling for better description lists --><style type='text/css'>dt { font-weight: bold;float: left;display:inline;margin-right: 1em} dd { display:block; margin-left: 2em}</style>

   pinchartl: <u>eballetbo</u>: indeed
   <br> <u>mchehab</u>: have you rebased the media_tree ?
   mchehab: no
   pinchartl: weird...
   <br> I have 322474f64b5ff6b9a0fa05ad632c75ca5e526fcc in my local tree
   mchehab: but yeah, one of your trees and one of sailus one have missing changesets
   pinchartl: it points to "[media] m88ds3103: use own reg update_bits() implementation"
   <br> so it's hardly one of my patches
   <br> I got it from upstream somewhere
   <br> and it's not in any branch or tag
   mchehab: /git/pinchartl/media.git
   <br> Fetching origin
   <br> From /git/media_tree
   <br> * branch HEAD -&gt; FETCH_HEAD
   <br> <u>error</u>: Could not read 322474f64b5ff6b9a0fa05ad632c75ca5e526fcc
   <br> <u>fatal</u>: Failed to traverse parents of commit 8132ccfb864a43e391a803caf69b3807c3bb4249
   <br> <u>error</u>: failed to run repack
   <br> /git/sailus/media_tree.git
   <br> <u>error</u>: Could not read 5ea878796f0a1d9649fe43a6a09df53d3915c0ef
   <br> <u>fatal</u>: Failed to traverse parents of commit ee912d2b7910796ee0a9c22d2cde1e339bfabd3d
   <br> <u>error</u>: failed to run repack
   <br> I was unable to find those two changesets, even on my local tree
   <br> if you push 322474f64b5ff6b9a0fa05ad632c75ca5e526fcc on some branch, I can add a tag for it at media_tree
   pinchartl: I have 322474f64b5ff6b9a0fa05ad632c75ca5e526fcc in my tree but it's not part of any of my branches
   <br> so I'd rather remove the branch on linuxtv.org that contains 322474f64b5ff6b9a0fa05ad632c75ca5e526fcc
   mchehab: well, create a branch or a tag and push it
   <br> the object should be sent upstream, fixing the breakage
   pinchartl: doing it right now
   <br> and fetched
   <br> git branch -a --contains should now help
   <br> fixed
   <br> the commit came from git://linuxtv.org/mchehab/media-next.git
   mchehab: ah
   <br> media-next *is* rebased
   <br> for every new Kernel version
   pinchartl: that seems reasonable to me, but then it shouldn't be used as a reference for the linuxtv.org trees
   mchehab: it is not a reference tree
   <br> it is a merge tree
   <br> btw, rebasing the media-next was recommended by the linux-next maintainer
   pinchartl: that's not an issue at all
   <br> 322474f64b5ff6b9a0fa05ad632c75ca5e526fcc ended up in my local tree
   <br> in a branch
   <br> I've pushed that branch to my linuxtv.org repository
   mchehab: ok
   pinchartl: and at some later point the object disappeared
   mchehab: I added a old/cs_322474f64b5f at the master tree
   pinchartl: which I assume means that it was never stored in my linuxtv.org tree
   mchehab: <u>pinchartl</u>: there are some scripts at the server that helps to avoid the trees to grow forever
   <br> doing git gc --aggressive
   <br> on all trees
   <br> once by month
   pinchartl: the object was reachable from a branch so gc shouldn't be a problem
   mchehab: and git gc once by day
   pinchartl: the problem is that the object was stored in a referenced tree and got dropped from it
   <br> we now it was in one of your -next branches
   mchehab: maybe you cloned your tree from media-next
   <br> it uses the tree you clone as the reference object tree
   pinchartl: no, my tree is cloned from mainline
   <br> with git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git added as a reference
   mchehab: no
   <br> $ more objects/info/alternates
   <br> /git/linux.git/objects
   <br> /git/media_tree.git/objects
   <br> it is not using linux-next as alternates for objects
   pinchartl: just it guess, could it be that you pushed the -next branch that contains 322474f64b5ff6b9a0fa05ad632c75ca5e526fcc to git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git by mistake at some point and then removed it ?
   <br> s/it guess/a guess/
   mchehab: sailus tree is still broken:
   <br> $ sudo git gc
   <br> <u>error</u>: Could not read 5ea878796f0a1d9649fe43a6a09df53d3915c0ef
   <br> <u>fatal</u>: Failed to traverse parents of commit ee912d2b7910796ee0a9c22d2cde1e339bfabd3d
   <br> <u>error</u>: failed to run repack
   pinchartl: I have 5ea878796f0a1d9649fe43a6a09df53d3915c0ef in my tree ;-)
   mchehab: <u>pinchartl</u>: no, I don't think I ever pushed -next to media_tree
   <br> ok, good
   <br> I'll use it to fix sailus tree then
   <br> hmm... you didn't push it
   pinchartl: I meant my local tree
   mchehab: could you please push it on some branch or tag?
   pinchartl: it comes from your -experimental tree
   mchehab: ah
   <br> I probably don't have it there anymore, I guess
   <br> at least I ran an script yesterday trying to find some missing changesets
   pinchartl: but why didn't it get pushed to Sakari's tree in the first place ?
   mchehab: no idea
   pinchartl: pushed to tree-fix
   mchehab: thanks!
   pinchartl: I don't think that adding old/* tags is the best fix though
   <br> as you'll need to keep them forever
   <br> the required objects should be pushed to the trees that need it instead
   ***: _daniel_1 changes his alias to _daniel_
   pinchartl: now that you've pushed old/cs_322474f64b5f you can't remove it anymore unless you git gc on master before doing it on my tree
   <br> otherwise my tree will lose the object as it's present in master
   mchehab: yes, those old/cs_* should be there forever
   <br> btw, sailus tree failed again, with another changeset: 5ea878796f0a1d9649fe43a6a09df53d3915c0ef
   pinchartl: that's the same one
   mchehab: oh, yes... weird
   <br> ed763ecbeff9b84c9208cdc27076522db0d24c1f
   <br> that's the next missing changeset on sailus tree
   pinchartl: Sakari should push the missing objects to his tree
   <br> there's no point in storing them to master
   ***: Você changes his alias to mchehab
   sailus: mchehab, pinchartl: Thanks for the info. I need to leave now but I'll check that later today.
   julius: tested two video cameras just now, they both did around ~10fps. on debian stable and sid. theres probably no magic switch to make that 30?
   pinchartl: <u>julius</u>: disabling auto-exposure and lowering the exposure time could help, but the images will be darker
   ***: headless_ changes his alias to headless
   julius: so whats a sure thing to buy for linux as webcam at 20?/$ ?
   <br> the uvc listing shows quite a lot of cameras...but no prices
   pinchartl: that's because we write free software, we don't care about prices ;-)
   larsc: <u>pinchartl</u>: so if I send you a TODO list you'll implement it free of charge, did I get that right? ;)
   pinchartl: <u>larsc</u>: sure, but remember that as the price tends towards zero the amount of time tends towards infinity :-)