#v4l 2016-01-06,Wed

↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls(Click on time to select a line by its url)

WhoWhatWhen
***lfam has left "Leaving" [02:47]
.......................................................................................... (idle for 7h25mn)
pinchartljavier__: can I assume that the tvp5150 patches that come from me have not been modified, or should I review them too ? [10:12]
javier__pinchartl: yes, they have not been modified besides simple changes to fix build issues due API changes [10:21]
pinchartljavier__: I'll trust you on that :-)
thank you
[10:21]
javier__pinchartl: thanks to you [10:22]
.......................... (idle for 2h7mn)
***zahari has quit IRC (Quit: WeeChat 1.3) [12:29]
..................................... (idle for 3h0mn)
ndufresnepinchartl: I started working on fixing bad stride with planar formats in uvc driver, I'd be interested to know if that approach is acceptable or not, http://paste.fedoraproject.org/307811/94120145/ [15:29]
......................... (idle for 2h0mn)
***benjiG has left [17:29]
................ (idle for 1h16mn)
tharvey has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds) [18:45]
...... (idle for 29mn)
awalls has left [19:14]
...................... (idle for 1h45mn)
pinchartlndufresne: yes that looks good to me [20:59]
ndufresneok, will give it proper testing and then submit
pinchartl: about the probing performance, in the end the vendor provided us a new firmware, it take 200ms now to start, so not a priority anymore ;-P
[21:01]
pinchartlI'd make the two parameters const
:-)
that's good because I don't remember the details of the issue ;-)
[21:03]
ndufresneok, taking note
pinchartl: haha
(for the record, when doing TRY_FMT with different parameter, we endup asking the same thing to the HW multiple time, because UVC parameteres are a subset of v4l2 parameters, solution could be more enumeration types in v4l2, or caching ...
[21:03]
.......... (idle for 46mn)
javier__pinchartl: I'm waiting for your answer to my latest comments about the delay / sleep API usage before posting a v2 [21:50]
pinchartljavier__: no strong opinion, I'll let you decide [21:53]
shuahpinchartl [21:54]
pinchartlshuah: hi [21:55]
javier__pinchartl: Ok, I'll post the patches tomorrow then. Thanks a lot for your feedback! [21:55]
shuahWe discussed this (I think before) - Managed media API need to hold struct device reference I think [21:55]
pinchartlshuah: yes, I wanted to discuss that with you. the current implementation is broken I believe
as media_device will be freed when the last device is unbound
which will race with userspace
[21:55]
shuahI vaguely recall talking about it in Finland and I ran into it while I was testing the patch series I sent out [21:56]
pinchartlI think we'll have to do without devm_* and manage the reference count explicitly [21:56]
shuahWe have to solve two issues I would think - one when media device is a non-devm resource
We need to be devm resource for alsa and media drivers to share it
[21:57]
pinchartlwhy ?
can't we have a central media_device allocator/registry without devm ?
[21:57]
shuahbecause ALSA and au0828 don't share any data structures
take a look at the patch series I just sent out and see what you think
[21:58]
pinchartlwhich patch in particular ? [21:59]
shuahpatch 18
and 26
[22:00]
pinchartlok, let me prototype what I'm talking about otherwise we'll spend hours discussing it without understanding each other :-)
(I have a feeling the night will be long...)
[22:01]
shuahright - I will send you my current work in progress for you to check as well
It might be late for you so - we don't have to talk about it now
[22:02]

↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls(Click on time to select a line by its url)