[09:23] <ribalda> mchehab: ping
[09:24] <ribalda> mchehab: I was wondering if you had time to take a look to https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/36883/
[09:27] <mchehab> ribalda: no, sorry
[09:27] <mchehab> it is now too late for 4.9...
[09:27] <mchehab> I'll handle just after -rc1
[09:34] <ribalda>  no worries, whenever you have the time
[09:34] <mchehab> ok, sorry for that
[09:35] <ribalda> no problem
[09:35] <mchehab> it is not about the lack of the time... it is just that we stop accepting patches the week before the merge window...
[09:35] <mchehab> per request from Kernel jenitor's people
[09:36] <mchehab> to give them a chance to finish reviewing what's there and eventually send things like Kconfig fixes
[09:36] <mchehab> also, to give people a chance of testing the Kernel
[13:37] <rmull> Hi, is there a way to know what V4L2_CID control parameter number corresponds to the list of camera controls printed by v4l2-ctl -l ?
[13:43] <rmull> Oh, it looks like I can maybe compare the strace output to get the V4L2_CID #define and then reference that with the kernel's include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h
[13:54] <pinchartl> rmull: if you use yavta to print the controls you'll get the numerical IDs :-)
[13:57] <rmull> pinchartl: Cool, that works well
[13:58] <rmull> What I'm actually trying to do is get a better handle on how to change my camera's parameters on the fly from opencv
[13:59] <rmull> But the opencv->v4l2 mapping is pretty incomplete
[14:20] <rmull> I can set the controls with the raw numerical values though, so that's good
[15:11] *** benjiG has left 
[15:19] *** rmull has left 
[16:30] <mchehab> sailus: ping
[17:15] *** awalls has left 
[18:30] <ndufresne> javier__: notice that this function in fimc is quite advance, as it will accept userspace provided stride if large enough, though it's missing quite some extra validation, so userspace would pick an invalid alignment
[18:31] <javier__> ndufresne: Ok, thanks for the notice
[18:32] <ndufresne> though the stride nego is broken in gst (import path), I'll need to look at that soon
[18:34] <javier__> ndufresne: Ok