<!-- Some styling for better description lists --><style type='text/css'>dt { font-weight: bold;float: left;display:inline;margin-right: 1em} dd { display:block; margin-left: 2em}</style> mripard: <u>jmondi</u>: sorry, I forgot to answer yesterday <br> <u>jmondi</u>: I think you're right hverkuil: <u>jmondi</u>: ping jmondi: <u>hverkuil</u>: pong hverkuil: Regarding the 'sh: Remove soc_camera from defconfigs' patch series: is it ready to go in? And it can go through the media tree, right? jmondi: <u>hverkuil</u>: let me check, I don't think I have any pending comment, right? hverkuil: there was one from Geert, but as I understand it he agreed with the patches. jmondi: <u>hverkuil</u>: I think so... So yes, seems like it's good to go <br> <u>hverkuil</u>: not that much feedback from SH people, but I'm getting used to it :( hverkuil: OK, I'll include it in my upcoming pull request. jmondi: <u>hverkuil</u>: thank you for taking care of this sh related stuff... <br> <u>hverkuil</u>: next step is to remove soc_camera drivers? do you need help with that? hverkuil: No problem. <br> I think I can take care of the soc_camera removal. jmondi: <u>hverkuil</u>: great! thanks! hverkuil: <u>jmondi</u>: I still see a SOC_CAMERA in arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig jmondi: <u>hverkuil</u>: I limited my cleanup to the arch/sh part, apparently there are a lot of ARM boards with SOC_CAMERA dependencies <br> <u>hverkuil</u>: I thought the ARM part was taken care of already :( hverkuil: All the other soc-camera references in arch/arm are all bogus since the corresponding soc-camera driver was removed a long time ago. <br> But I think the shmobile_defconfig config might be something you want to fix. jmondi: <u>hverkuil</u>: incremental patch or should I resend the series? hverkuil: incremental patch. jmondi: <u>hverkuil</u>: will do! sorry for missing that one hverkuil: np sailus: <u>hverkuil</u>: Ping? ***: benjiG has left <br> gnurou has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)