| ↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |
| Who | What | When |
|---|---|---|
| svarbanov | hverkuil, could you make a review: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg171409.html and https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg171412.html. | [08:39] |
| hverkuil | svarbanov: I'll take a look. Thanks for reminding me, I think I missed that series. | [08:51] |
| .... (idle for 18mn) | ||
| svarbanov: reviewed | [09:09] | |
| svarbanov | hverkuil, thanks. one more for review https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg2222553.html | [09:13] |
| .... (idle for 18mn) | ||
| hverkuil | svarbanov: done | [09:31] |
| svarbanov | hverkuil, thanks. I guess your Reviewed-by tag means that I can take the controls through Venus pull request (if not too late) ? | [09:33] |
| hverkuil | yes, but see my last review, you should make a new series combining the two older ones with my few comments fixed. I'll reply with some more Reviewed-by tags and then you can make a PR for this. | [09:34] |
| svarbanov | hverkuil, yep, sure I will submit new series today. Thanks! | [09:35] |
| ................................ (idle for 2h38mn) | ||
| *** | benjiG has left | [12:13] |
| ............................ (idle for 2h19mn) | ||
| svarbanov | hverkuil, sent new series for CQ and frame-skip https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/20/619 | [14:32] |
| .......... (idle for 48mn) | ||
| ndufresne | svarbanov: any specific reason you didn't add clickable link to the "VBV (MPEG1/2/4) or CPB (H264) buffer size control." as I suggested ?
for the levels I understand there is many (per codecs) I wonder if these could be in a section, and so we could add a clickable link to the section there | [15:20] |
| svarbanov | ndufresne, no I just forgot :)
ndufresne, let me see what I can do, building docs and make is not trivial to me, yet :( | [15:21] |
| ................ (idle for 1h18mn) | ||
| ndufresne | svarbanov: indeed, I think it could be nice in fact if each time we edit the doc in a patch, some bot send us a link to a temporay compilation of the doc, do we can get a final view of it | [16:42] |
| ........ (idle for 39mn) | ||
| ezequielg | svarbanov: out of curiosity, what obstacle do you see when building the doc? | [17:21] |
| svarbanov | ezequielg, Sphinx version is too old my distro
ezequielg, I source this media_tree/sphinx_2.4.4/bin/activate, and rebuilding htmldocs | [17:29] |
| ezequielg | ah ah
make htmldocs works almost out of the box here, that's why i was asking but yeah, the virtualenv should be of help. | [17:34] |
| ..... (idle for 22mn) | ||
| Kwiboo: Hello there! In terms of h264 uapi, I think the only open question is if the DPB proposal I've made on the recent patchset is enough to support field encoded content.
I think in terms fo RKVDEC and Hantro, it's enouhg. and Cedrus doesn't need that. gnurou: does the mtk stateless h264 decoder support field encoding? | [17:56] | |
| ↑back Search ←Prev date Next date→ Show only urls | (Click on time to select a line by its url) |