Mailing List archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[vdr] Re: Bug by deleting a Record
"Koch, Steffen" wrote:
>
> > > > You may be right, but my way shold also work, or not? :-)
> > > normaly yes... but you should give vdr time to really delete
> > > the recording.
> > and how long shold I wait? VDR shold 'see' the existing
> > 'deleted' file and then delete it also physicly.
> normally if no recording is in progress vdr starts approx. 1 minute after
> last user input
>
> @Klaus: true or not??
Yes, that's true, because actually deleting a recording which may consist
of several GB of data can take a while, and if there's a recording going on
at that time there may be buffer overflows. Therefore VDR tries to do
this when it has nothing else to do.
But I agree that if renaming a recording to *.del it should first check
if there is already such a name and physically remove it.
I'll change it that way...
Klaus
--
_______________________________________________________________
Klaus Schmidinger Phone: +49-8635-6989-10
CadSoft Computer GmbH Fax: +49-8635-6989-40
Hofmark 2 Email: kls@cadsoft.de
D-84568 Pleiskirchen, Germany URL: www.cadsoft.de
_______________________________________________________________
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index