Mailing List archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[vdr] Re: Seperation of sat clock code
- To: vdr@linuxtv.org
- Subject: [vdr] Re: Seperation of sat clock code
- From: NoSpam-@zocki.toppoint.de (Rainer Zocholl)
- Date: 29 Apr 2002 00:43:00 +0200
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
- Delivered-To: mhonarc@limes.convergence.de
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204171031590.18912-100000@fb07-calculator.math.uni-giessen.de>
- Organization: http://www.toppoint.de
- Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
- Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org
Sergei.Haller@math.uni-giessen.de(Sergei Haller) 17.04.02 11:00
Once upon a time Sergei Haller shaped the electrons to say...
>On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, bernd_muc@gmx.de () wrote:
>The reason I never sent it is the following: the ntp clients use the
>Network Time Protocol (RFCs 958, 1059, 1119, 1305), which is _MUCH_
>more complicated than the Time Protocol (RFC 868). So I don't know if
>it is possible to tell an ntp client to use the Time Service at Port
>37. (but probably we could just ask the authors)
Maybe speak to the XNTP-guys to implement a "satelite clock device"
to the (X)NTP-Package?
AFAIK it's not sooooo complicate to add a new "clock device".
(No sorry, i have no time to do it ;-))
Adding the full NTP-server into VDR would be possible but of cause overkill.
But there is still the problem:
How to share the hardware resources?
Maybe it would be sufficient to "offer" the time on a named pipe or at
port 37 so the special "ntp-vdr-clock-device" can read it and offer
it via XNTP at port 123?
The ntp-protokoll should allow (AFAIK) to mark the time delivered as
"not reliable yet" if the trusted channel is not selected.
>And again, this would only be available while one of the dvb cards is
>tuned to the trusted transponder.
>another advantage would be that the time client could run with root
>rights.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index