Mailing List archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[vdr] Re: recording on almost full hdd
- To: <vdr@linuxtv.org>
- Subject: [vdr] Re: recording on almost full hdd
- From: "Bernd Hoose" <bernd@hoose.de>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 16:23:55 +0200
- content-class: urn:content-classes:message
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
- Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"
- Delivered-To: mhonarc@limes.convergence.de
- Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
- Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org
- Thread-Index: AcHvhlBS0o37siXyThmG02yQq5gkpwAAvBMw
- Thread-Topic: [vdr] Re: recording on almost full hdd
Look to older Postings.
Ive done a little testing about different filesystems, because i have
some framedropping when system is very busy.
XFS is there the best solution on my system, since changing no more
droppout in recordings.
Bernd
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tobias Meyer-Janson
> [mailto:tobias.meyer-janson@sign-lang.uni-hamburg.de]
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 2:45 PM
> To: vdr@linuxtv.org
> Subject: [vdr] Re: recording on almost full hdd
>
>
> Carsten Koch <Carsten.Koch@icem.de> wrote:
>
> > Quite a while ago I experimented with reiserfs and XFS.
> > I found out that reiserfs (and IIRC other file systems)
> > got extremely slow when the disk was almost full.
>
> Oh, perhaps this is one of the points causing my problems
> with artefacts
> and so on (see the thread about "Disk performance")?
>
> I thought reiserfs would be the best fs for vdr?
> Are there any general facts witch fs to use on a vdr-only
> system and so
> on? What about fragmentation? I thought it would be no
> problem for linux
> nor vdr, am I wrong?
>
>
> TMJ
>
>
>
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index