Mailing List archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[vdr] Re: usleep question.
Andreas Schultz wrote
> On Sunday 07 April 2002 13:12, Carsten Koch wrote:
> > ...
> > depend of the fact that usleep(1) sleeps for
> > longer than a MICROsecond?
> > After all, there are a million microseconds in
> > a second! ;-)
> >
> While looking into this, i also found something interresting
> about this, from
> linux/kernel/times.c:
>
> asmlinkage long sys_nanosleep(struct timespec *rqtp, struct
> timespec *rmtp)
> {
> .....
> /*
> * Short delay requests up to 2 ms will be
> handled with
> * high precision by a busy wait for all
> real-time processes.
> *
Are were talking about ms (milliseconds) or 盜 (microseconds) ?
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index