[vdr] Re: where is vdr goin' to?

[Sascha Volkenandt <lists@magoa.net>]

At Freitag, 13. Juni 2003 22:37 Rene Bartsch wrote:
> I agree. There shouldn't be any need to compile against DVB-driver (VDR
> should include all necessary code to interface to DVB-API, e.g. in case
> you run kernel-drivers ...).

I disagree with that, since kernel-drivers also provide include files. In 
fact, the driver includes are kernel include files (they are in a linux/ 
subdirectory).

What I agree with is that VDR could be independent of ANY hardware (also DVB 
stuff), and that would mean to put all DVB-specific code into a PlugIn. But 
that would make things more complicated again if you wanted to setup a 
DVB-only system quickly :)

> Multi-user-handling/-threading is also very important to make VDR usable
> in home-net. For me, it's much too statical and there are too much
> dependencies.

Most of that dependencies are (apart from DVB) created by PlugIns, not by 
VDR itself, or am I wrong?

Greetings,
Sascha


-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.