Mailing List archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[vdr] Re: kvdr-0.61
- To: vdr@linuxtv.org
- Subject: [vdr] Re: kvdr-0.61
- From: Guido Fiala <gfiala@s.netic.de>
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 17:09:06 +0200
- Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
- In-reply-to: <3F521C27.8050404@gmx.net>
- References: <E19t5wZ-000KJY-G1@mail.s.netic.de> <E19tTX4-0005sx-UV@mail.s.netic.de> <3F521C27.8050404@gmx.net>
- Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
- Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org
> > What combination did i forget?
>
> 1. i use 800x600 as desktop resolution, because i think programs that need
> to interpolate use less cpu power that with a higher resolution.
That's right, even for Xv, at least so i observed.
> 2. second i use the monitors buttons to move the picture to the border of
> the monitor.
> for me, this results in best usage of the size :)
> the black borders from 768x576 to 800x600 are minimal, and as i said: i do
> not see them anymore :)
If you have no 768x576 modeline kvdr should use your 800x600 modeline anyway.
> so the solution with 768x576 with (little) black borders is usefull i think
> and it would be nice if it could be (re-)implemented in kvdr.
I'am still not sure what i'am supposed to have out-implemented.
Has someone else observed such a problem too?
Maybe you can write me a step-by-step procedure to verify that problem.
--
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index