[vdr] Re: Experiences with patched VDR 1.2.x (was Re: [PATCH] Old descriptorh

["Christian Jacobsen" <christian.jacobsen@stageholding.de>]

Hallo,

>If you use WinCVS check out with tag "xy", if you use cvs under Linux try
>option "-r". Nevertheless, I've attached the two versions. Until now, I'd
>no
>time to test the old function. Maybe you've a little bit. ;-)

Yes we will see, I will try to find some time :)
>
>
>Meanwhile I run a patched vdr 1.2.5 and DVB with latency=64. With this
>constellation I've less "video data stream broken"-errors and, that's the
>reason
>for the patch, _no_ UPT-Errors. That's why I can't believe, that
>interferences
>causes the UPT-Error. But maybe the "video data stream broken"-error.

That is probably the rerason why I did not have any VDSB (Video Data
Stream Broken) - I have had latency=128 for more than 6 months ;)
(I do it wit setpci)

Greetings
Christian Jacobsen



-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.