[vdr] Re: [ANNOUNCE] vdr-softdevice-0.0.7pre2

[Stefan Lucke <stefan@lucke.in-berlin.de>]

On Mittwoch, 4. August 2004 22:20, Carsten Koch wrote:
> Stefan Lucke wrote:

[ .. ]
> >>		    usleep(2100);
> 
> IIRC, the kernel timer has a resolution of 10 ms on Linux/i386,
> so anything between usleep(1) and usleep(10000) should be the
> same, right?

I was thinking on this mail:
http://www.linuxtv.org/mailinglists/vdr/2004/06-2004/msg00446.html

> In particular, usleep(1000) and usleep(2100) should have the
> same effect.

Someone mentioned that sleeps < 2ms will be executed in a tight loop in
kernel 2.6 based systems.


Stefan Lucke