[vdr] Re: softdevice 0.0.7 cvs crash tests...

[Nicolas Huillard <nhuillard@ghs.fr>]

Stefan Lucke wrote:

...

> I tested my change with your three streams (took only 001.vdr files). The only
> difference I see is ffmpeg (vdr1.3.12, gcc 3.3.1) mine is:
> [softdevice] ffmpeg version(0.4.8) build(4700)
I had "ffmpeg version(0.4.8) build(4680)" before I upgraded to 
0.4.9-pre1 ("ffmpeg version(0.4.9-pre1) build(4718)"). According to 
http://ffmpeg.sourceforge.net/, "ffmpeg 0.4.8 really sucks compared to 
cvs" (as of Apr 24, 2004). What about the difference in build number ?

Do you also have 2.6.7-epia created with plain 2.6.7 + 
http://www.epiawiki.org/wiki/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=8 
(patch-2.6.7-epia1.bz2). Mine is Debian 2.6.7 kernel source + this 
patch. This gives a kernel *without* the EXTRAVERSION= label (was 
"epia1" with the 2.6.6 patch), and a lot of messges in syslog from the 
viafb kernel module (I did comment them in my previous 2.6.6 kernel) :

Aug 11 08:22:24 vdr kernel: check x:720  y:576  bpp:32
Aug 11 08:22:24 vdr kernel: selmode :75
Aug 11 08:22:24 vdr kernel: setmode x:720 y:576 bpp:32
Aug 11 08:22:24 vdr kernel: pan_display offset:0 0
Aug 11 08:22:24 vdr kernel: pan_display offset:0
Aug 11 08:22:24 vdr kernel: pan_display offset:0 0
Aug 11 08:22:24 vdr kernel: pan_display offset:0
Aug 11 08:22:24 vdr kernel: pan_display offset:0 0
Aug 11 08:22:24 vdr kernel: pan_display offset:0
Aug 11 08:22:24 vdr kernel: pan_display offset:0 576
Aug 11 08:22:24 vdr kernel: pan_display offset:1658880

If you don't have those, maybe we do not have the same kernel ?

--
NH