[linux-dvb] What do you think of mpsys library ? (for ca_zap)

Manu Abraham manu at kromtek.com
Sun Apr 3 09:15:17 CEST 2005

Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 12:28:20AM +0200, Kenneth Aafløy wrote:
>>On Saturday 02 April 2005 00:13, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
>>>Kenneth Aafløy wrote:
>>>>} vid_dev_info_t;
>>>Please don't use typedefs unless you are explicitly defining
>>>opaque data types. It makes it more difficult to see what's going on.
>>I'm wondering if you recentment is against the typedef in general or the
>>implementation of a clean api.
> I'm neither agains typedefs, where they make sense, nor against clean APIs.
>>The api will be well documented, and so
>>will the new typedefed types? I was merily following the alsa api here,
>>so I'm not in any way married to it yet! Any suggestions is very much
>>welcome, please prove why your suggestion will produce a cleaner api.
> Typedefs have a purpose: Creating an abstraction, i.e. hiding
> information about the type from the user. IMHO it is totally useless to
> stick a typedef on every struct or enum definition. All you get is
> obfuscation. And the _t suffixes are ugly, too.
> Please ask yourself if and why you want to hide from the users
> of your API why e.g. vid_dev_hierarchy_t is an enum.

Yes, typedef's really make opaque data types, The programmer feels 
really comfortable, but a newbie would find it quite a bit hard, ie, a 
larger learning curve for the new types. ie, a longer period somebody 
has to work on that to get moving.


More information about the linux-dvb mailing list