[linux-dvb] Rationalisation of /dev/adapterX/caY devices
Andrew de Quincey
adq_dvb at lidskialf.net
Mon Apr 10 17:41:48 CEST 2006
> Well, that's one way. We move CA related stuff from the user into the
> kernel space. It doesn't matter for me (I'm trying to implement multiple
> CAM support for libdvben50221 with Andrew at the moment), but wouldn't it
> break other software (like vdr etc) which depend on this?
> So we have two options right now:
> - implementing a kernel layer with support for both, the old and the new
Thats kinda why I was asking - to see what people thought. I've just had a
look at the VDR source, and it won't cope with this change. So we can't do it
really... maybe if we ever do another version of the DVB API.
> - breaking API of libdvben50221, which hasn't been published offically
> (only available through mercury)
I don't mind breaking this API. its still under development.
More information about the linux-dvb