[linux-dvb] Initial tuning file fi-3KTV DVB-C
christophpfister at gmail.com
Mon Nov 26 22:33:42 CET 2007
2007/11/22, Antti Palosaari <crope at iki.fi>:
> I got current channel list from operator and make & update files against
> it. New tuning files attached. There is also list I got from the operator.
> List of all 3KTV networks and proper tuning file:
> operator reference channels fi-3KTV
> Lahti fi-Lahti
> Kuopio fi-Kuopio
> Oulu fi-Oulu (same channels as old fi-Oulu, only cosmetic changes)
> Lohja fi-Lohja
> Savonlinna fi-3KTV
> Mikkeli fi-3KTV
> Iisalmi fi-Iisalmi
> Kajaani fi-3KTV
> Ylivieska fi-3KTV
> Salo fi-Salo (replace existing with this one)
> Raisio fi-3KTV
> Laitila fi-Laitila
> Rauma fi-3KTV (old can be removed totally from dvb-apps, uses reference
> Pori fi-3KTV
> Karjaa fi-3KTV
> Virrat fi-3KTV
> Kotka fi-Kotka
> Parainen fi-Parainen
The proposed splitting is a bit problematic, because you have specific
entries and a "fallback" (maybe cause some confusion among users). And
it is hard to check as I _quite_ soon realised.
As you have all the necessary information in one table I decided to
create a single file containing every case (it isn't the smallest one,
I know, but within the limits and quite easy to review and maintain).
Thank you very much for your effort!
> Antti Palosaari wrote:
> > Christoph Pfister wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> (sorry for the late reply)
> > no problem :)
> >> Am Dienstag 13 November 2007 schrieb Antti Palosaari:
> >>> hello
> >>> There is file containing reference channels used in 3KTV networks around
> >>> the Finland. There is about 20 3KTV networks but all didn't use exactly
> >>> same channel list for reason or other.
> >>> Now there is fi-Rauma and fi-Salo that contains same channels, should
> >>> those removed?
> >> If 3KTV is the provider meant with those files, yes. If it's
> >> just "coincidence" that a different provider uses the same initial params, no
> >> (to ensure that you can adjust stuff independently when something changes in
> >> future). Afair fi-Salo contains the network operated by SSP (Salon Seudun
> >> puhelin), so as long as that isn't the same as 3KTV (due to a renaming etc
> >> etc) fi-Salo shouldn't be removed. Dunno about fi-Rauma ...
> > hmm, that whole 3KTV / Finnet / local operators situation wasn't clear
> > for me some time back, thats why I send fi-Salo...
> > * 3KTV is cable network operator owned by Finnet.
> > * Finnet is union of the few local operators
> > * SSP, Salo, is local operator
> > * Lännen Puhelin, Rauma, is local operator
> > * Oulun Puhelin, Oulu, is local operator
> > I am not sure how it exactly goes, but I think local networks are owned
> > by local operators, but channel feed (and reference settings) are coming
> > from 3KTV. Most local operators uses just those reference channel maps
> > given by 3KTV. But there is still some who not, from reason or other.
> > Looks like Oulu, Kuopio, Lohja and Kotka are deviating from 3KTV
> > reference settings. From this situation, correct way to do this is
> > adding files for fi-3KTV, fi-Oulu, fi-Kuopio, fi-Lohja and fi-Kotka. I
> > think I will make and send initial tuning files for these missing ones
> > using channel map that differs from the reference.
> > There is old and very readable channel map for clarify this situation:
> > http://www.lumonetti.fi/export/download/kanavanippujen_taajuudet310806.PDF
> > And if this is not fuzzy enough, I can say that for example Oulun
> > Puhelin and Lännen Puhelin are not members of the Finnet anymore... They
> > and some more just left Finnet union and are now known as dna.
> > Regards
> > Antti Palosaari
More information about the linux-dvb