[vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.17

Udo Richter udo_richter at gmx.de
Sun Apr 3 15:21:05 CEST 2011

Am 27.03.2011 16:45, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
> Can you please rewrite your patch so that it keeps the original 'd'
> variable? I liked the fact that the 'nextUpdate' variable was incremented
> in *one* place, and not in several places. Made the whole thing more
> transparent to me. Besides, I could then see what you have *actually*
> changed ;-)

Another example on how coding style is a matter of taste. One of the
first things I changed was the removing of the d variable that is IMHO
superfluous, doesn't have an unique meaning (file age in seconds and
time to next check), and no descriptive name. ;)

Anyway, I've rewritten it to match your original patch more closely.
Actually I'm surprised how similar they got again, I had some evolution
steps that were completely different.

Attached is the rewritten patch as updatemarks-4, and for your
convenience a diff between updatemarks-2 and updatemarks-4 that shows
the differences more closely.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: vdr-1.7.17-updatemarks-4.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2280 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/attachments/20110403/c8801fd5/attachment-0002.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: vdr-1.7.17-updatemarks-2-to-4.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2393 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/attachments/20110403/c8801fd5/attachment-0003.bin>

More information about the vdr mailing list