Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions
(21 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== |
== main page hacked == |
||
Main Page was "hacked" by a stupid guy: http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=11512 |
|||
Should the entry of KaxTV not be removed in the main listing if it is discontinued and now part of Kaffeine? |
|||
someone should consider taking some actions towards his account. |
|||
I would like to say something to that guy: |
|||
== Use case page for linux tv == |
|||
do you really think you are an hacker just because you changed the main page of a wiki that can be edited by whoever wants? |
|||
If you just sit down and think you will realize the real hackers here are all those coders here behind who hack inside closed devices and manage to free them through a gpl driver written from scratch. |
|||
Hello |
|||
Instead of abusing open source communities where nobody has got the power because everybody does have the power (for istance I registered just in order to change back the homepage, exactly as you did to destroy it), focus your efforts on big evil corporations websites: there you can fight against a webadmin and maybe eventually win, but never would you win over a linux community, it's simply too big (and does not code for money)! |
|||
I was thinking about creating a page that would list ''working'' solutions for various |
|||
encrypted operators across the world. This would be structured something like: |
|||
* Section Country |
|||
* sub-section: Operator |
|||
* A table for budget card that would contain: software, card, CAM type, CAM brand, comments |
|||
* A likewise table for FF cards. |
|||
== Categories articles organization == |
|||
What do you think about such a page ? |
|||
I just added some trivial categories to the ISDB-T devices pages, but, I have a little trouble. Watching the existing scheme in another standard, for example DVB-T, we can find categories like "DVB-T PCI Cards" in the same name page, but in the "DVB-T PCie Cards" we have the "PCIe" category. There are anything "official" about the procedures of Categories? --[[User:Howl|howl]] 01:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Cheers |
|||
-- would be very helpful I find. BTW, I think we should have the wiki-typical "just do it" approach here, i.e. don't ask - if you think it'd be useful and help others, yes, write it up! |
|||
--[[User:LAk loho|LAk loho]] 23:42, 24 April 2006 (CEST) |
|||
-- Done in [[Use_cases]]. Now I hope that other people will complete this page. |
|||
--[[User:Ddumont|Ddumont]] 10:19, 28 July 2006 (CEST) |
|||
== Long software list on it's own page? == |
|||
Hi! I was thinking the software list on the main page gets too long. At the same time, not all software is helpful for all users (analogue, FF or budget cards). So does anyone mind if I move all links to a separate page, where there'd be comments on each program? --[[User:LAk loho|LAk loho]] 23:42, 24 April 2006 (CEST) |
|||
-- By comments, do you mean a one line description for the software or longer comments ? |
|||
--[[User:Ddumont|Ddumont]] 14:23, 25 April 2006 (CEST) |
|||
I thought of something like one line for each program or maybe a table. Longer descriptions are/should be available on the individual program's page so there's no real need. --[[User:LAk loho|LAk loho]] 21:18, 29 April 2006 (CEST) |
|||
Okay, I did it now. See the [[software]] page if you wonder where all the programs went to. Of course it's a bit subjective which programs to list on the front page but I think those are the most commonly used. If you think a prominent program is now missing, just put it back up again. [[User:Lak loho|Lak loho]] |
|||
== Leadtek DTV1000 Remote Control == |
|||
Hi, |
|||
I have been working for a while in developing the code for the Leadtek DTV1000 remore control. I think is almost ready (it works for me), maybe someone can double check it for me. How do I do I contribute to the project? |
|||
Thanks |
|||
probleme with |
|||
dvb: Leadtek Winfast DTV dongle |
|||
driver: v4l-dvb-stk3000p-e5798f307b00 |
|||
firmware: dvb-usb-dibusb-6.0.0.8.fw |
|||
distrib: ubuntu 6.6 5.10 fc5 |
|||
good aerial (very good reception with other dvb and analog) try anyway with ampli and atenuation |
|||
i can scan only 2 freq on 5 (freq under 500 mega) |
|||
the tzap on a good or no good channel is very unstable: |
|||
claude@ch:~$ tzap TF1 (this channel do not work) |
|||
using '/dev/dvb/adapter0/frontend0' and '/dev/dvb/adapter0/demux0' |
|||
tuning to 562000000 Hz |
|||
video pid 0x0078, audio pid 0x0082 |
|||
status 02 | signal b237 | snr 0000 | ber 001fffff | unc 0000ffff | |
|||
status 1e | signal b231 | snr 0000 | ber 001fffff | unc 0000ffff | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
status 1e | signal ff3f | snr 0001 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000ef5 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
status 1e | signal 0000 | snr ffff | ber 00000000 | unc 00000ef6 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
status 1e | signal 0000 | snr ffff | ber 00000000 | unc 00000ef6 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
status 1e | signal 0000 | snr ffff | ber 000001d0 | unc 00000ef5 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
status 1e | signal 0710 | snr 0000 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000ef6 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
status 1e | signal 0000 | snr ffff | ber 00000240 | unc 00000ef5 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
status 1e | signal 0900 | snr 0000 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000ef6 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
status 1e | signal 0000 | snr ffff | ber 00000000 | unc 00000ef5 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
claude@ch:~$ tzap "Direct 8" (this channel work) |
|||
using '/dev/dvb/adapter0/frontend0' and '/dev/dvb/adapter0/demux0' |
|||
tuning to 474000000 Hz |
|||
video pid 0x00a0, audio pid 0x0050 |
|||
status 03 | signal dc0d | snr 0001 | ber 001fffff | unc 0000ffff | |
|||
status 1f | signal dc11 | snr 0001 | ber 00057010 | unc 00000046 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
status 1f | signal c010 | snr 00c0 | ber 00029230 | unc 00000018 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
status 1f | signal 4830 | snr 0002 | ber 0000dab0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
status 1f | signal 6a30 | snr 0000 | ber 00011d90 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
status 1f | signal 7610 | snr 0000 | ber 00014130 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
status 1f | signal 0430 | snr 0000 | ber 00005840 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
status 1f | signal 6100 | snr 0000 | ber 000074c0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
status 1f | signal d300 | snr 0002 | ber 0000af80 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
status 1f | signal be00 | snr 0000 | ber 00009640 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
status 1f | signal 5900 | snr 0000 | ber 0000e730 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
status 1f | signal 9c30 | snr 0001 | ber 00015770 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
status 1f | signal 5d30 | snr 0000 | ber 0000bbf0 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS_LOCK |
|||
i think, this look like a wrong initilisation ???? |
|||
Hi, guy's I see here is a lot good tester,, If some one is intereted, I have soruce code complete form a SetTopBox , CPU IBMpower PC 405 stb002500,flash 2mb, ram 16mb,, the stb is very fast and video and audios is same as dreambox, because have same CPU, but difrent Model DB is a stb004400 PPC. |
|||
This unit on U* market is working very good on N2 , but becuase charlie make a change over 1 month now, stb can't view video and audio from charlie, what they make is a new update REVISION. |
|||
At same time few others brand stb have been release a temporary soltution, but using conditional access card , on they unit they make some new modification on the STB firmware , what it does is comunicate with the smartcard, also they implement on they firmware a Boxkey #, becuase the smartcard have a Box key and a CAM ID, so , for these reason card get comunicate with the unit, and video and aduio come back up.. |
|||
so if some good programer are intereted , I will provide STB sample for testing purpose.. |
|||
thanks,. sorry about my spell. |
Latest revision as of 06:44, 30 September 2013
main page hacked
Main Page was "hacked" by a stupid guy: http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=11512 someone should consider taking some actions towards his account.
I would like to say something to that guy: do you really think you are an hacker just because you changed the main page of a wiki that can be edited by whoever wants?
If you just sit down and think you will realize the real hackers here are all those coders here behind who hack inside closed devices and manage to free them through a gpl driver written from scratch.
Instead of abusing open source communities where nobody has got the power because everybody does have the power (for istance I registered just in order to change back the homepage, exactly as you did to destroy it), focus your efforts on big evil corporations websites: there you can fight against a webadmin and maybe eventually win, but never would you win over a linux community, it's simply too big (and does not code for money)!
Categories articles organization
I just added some trivial categories to the ISDB-T devices pages, but, I have a little trouble. Watching the existing scheme in another standard, for example DVB-T, we can find categories like "DVB-T PCI Cards" in the same name page, but in the "DVB-T PCie Cards" we have the "PCIe" category. There are anything "official" about the procedures of Categories? --howl 01:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)