ATSC PCI cards: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
My experience with capturing using the pcHDTV is that it uses 1.3% of CPU (azap + cat + cx88[0] dvb on an athlon64 3500). Actually watching live or captured streams does take a lot of CPU, though, especially without xvmc. --[[User:Mitchskin|Mitch]] 21:50, 14 May 2005 (CEST) |
My experience with capturing using the pcHDTV is that it uses 1.3% of CPU (azap + cat + cx88[0] dvb on an athlon64 3500). Actually watching live or captured streams does take a lot of CPU, though, especially without xvmc. --[[User:Mitchskin|Mitch]] 21:50, 14 May 2005 (CEST) |
||
The ATSC frontend of the DViCO card is under active development. Only the analog capability is working |
The ATSC frontend of the DViCO card is under active development. Only the analog capability is currently working. |
||
Revision as of 20:09, 25 May 2005
As of right now there are 2 confirmed working cards and 1 possible working card.
The PCHDTV card The air2pc card
The possible working card is: The DViCO FusionHDTV 3 GOLD
The air2pc seems to take some work off the processor while I have read the PCHDTV uses 80-90% on a athalon64 3000.
My experience with capturing using the pcHDTV is that it uses 1.3% of CPU (azap + cat + cx88[0] dvb on an athlon64 3500). Actually watching live or captured streams does take a lot of CPU, though, especially without xvmc. --Mitch 21:50, 14 May 2005 (CEST)
The ATSC frontend of the DViCO card is under active development. Only the analog capability is currently working.