dafna2[m]: for the rkisp1 interrupt-names in the binding ... should it go into the existing example or become a second example node?
mmind00: I thought it could be nice if you add a second example
with the new compatible
dafna2[m]: ok, sounds great ... just wanted to clarify before I make the "wrong" choice ;-)
GBenji: there will be a v3 of the "Additional features for Hantro HEVC" series? The conclusion of the 7/8 discussion wasn't entirely clear to me.
hverkuil: btw, "[PATCH v4 00/35] media: ti-vpe: cal: improvements towards multistrea" series is ready for merging. 
tomba: ah, thank you.
tomba: posted PR.
hverkuil: thanks!