Mailing List archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[linux-dvb] Re: dvb-mpegtools LARGEFILE support issue??
My experience suggests that the version you compiled on Debian uses
ftell and that on SuSE is using ftello64. The old binary which worked
fine on 6GB files on my Mandrake 8.0 or 9.0 system also failed when
copied to Mandrake 9.1.
It suggests to me that the older Mandrake systems were either using a
libc where O_LARGEFILE was defined by default for fopen calls or were
setup to call the equivalent of ftell064 anyway. Comparing the include
files between my old and new setup doesn't reveal a problem - so perhaps
it lies with the version of libc supplied by Mandrake.
...perhaps I should go back to rolling my own system - at least you know
exactly where you are!!!!
Laurence
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 12:04, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 11:17:43AM +0200, Marcus Metzler wrote:
> > Laurence Culhane writes:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I recently upgraded one machine and found that dvb-mplex failed on large
> > > files with an EOVERFLOW resulting from an ftell call in inptstrn.cpp.
> > > The problem is that ftell doesn't handle LARGEFILES I think. A quick
> > > search through include files and the net seems to indicate that ftell
> > > and fseek should be replaced throughout by ftello and fseeko.
> > >
> > > These functions are correctly redeclared in the headers to ftello64 and
> > > fseeko64 when using large files.
> > >
> > > Apologies if I'm behind lagging behind - the problem may lie elsewhere -
> > > like with the Mandrake 9.1 I put on the offending machine.
> > >
> > > Laurence
> >
> > Do you have a specific example of the failure?
>
> A version compiled on SuSE (8.1 & 8.2) works. On Debian SID it doesn't.
>
> Even when you copy the binary from the SuSE-System i won't work on
> Debian SID.
>
> Otherwise i don't have any LFS problems.
> e.g. i createing DVD-Images burning them (up to 4489MB) works flawlessly
>
>
>
>
> Bis denn
>
> --
> Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as
> bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
> wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated,
> cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.
--
Laurence Culhane <mycroft@holmes.demon.co.uk>
--
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index