Mailing List archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[linux-dvb] Re: DVB-CI question
- To: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
- Subject: [linux-dvb] Re: DVB-CI question
- From: Johannes Stezenbach <js@convergence.de>
- Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 17:04:11 +0200
- Content-disposition: inline
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-reply-to: <200403271318.40821.adq_dvb@lidskialf.net>
- List-help: <mailto:ecartis@convergence.de?Subject=help>
- List-id: linux-dvb <linux-dvb.listen>
- List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
- List-unsubscribe: <https://mail.convergence2.de/cgi-bin/listen.cgi>
- Mail-followup-to: Johannes Stezenbach <js@convergence.de>,linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
- References: <200403261426.44080.adq_dvb@lidskialf.net> <200403261508.18997.adq_dvb@lidskialf.net> <406448BC.FA66AB7B@cadsoft.de> <200403271318.40821.adq_dvb@lidskialf.net>
- Sender: linux-dvb-bounce@linuxtv.org
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 01:18:40PM +0000, Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> On Friday 26 March 2004 15:14, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> >
> > Strange, from what I know a TPDU can be at most 2048 byte long...
>
> Out of interest, where does that 2048 figure come from? I can't see it in
> EN50221 or R206-001. I'm wondering if its an implementation limit imposed by
> the av7110 firmware. I can see why it would be like that; it really
> simplifies the defragmenter (I'll probably do the same myself).
>
> However, the worrying thing is that I can't see how the *CAM* knows the
> maximum TPDU size; there doesn't seem to be a protocol for negotiating it.
> Can anyone suggest what I'm missing?
Hm, unanswered questions...
Is there any news about the 2048 limit?
Johannes
--
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index