> Gregoire Favre wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:12:39PM +0200, Andreas Share wrote: > > > > > If you like some little bit faster tuning, you could try to remove the afc > > > correction from ves1x93.c > > > > Hello to all, > > > > I have now tested the patch from Andreas Share for a lots of time and I > > can say I don't have any UPT anymore and all my reccording are perfectly > > "vdrconert.pl"able which is very conveniant :-) > > > > So my question : any reason not to include it in the CVS ? > > I lost track of this thread :-(, and I also hoped that the > authors of the ves1x93 driver would comment on this. > > If someone sends me a clean patch which applies to > current CVS and doesn't break things for me, then I > will apply it. Hi, the patch should not break anything, 惡ause only the delay愀 are higher and the charge pump current is used for the ves1893 only. Maybe the new dvb_delay愀 are to high, but the current dvb_delay(5); is for most setups to low and caused multiple dvb_frontend tune attempt`s. Andreas
Attachment:
ves1x93_cpc.V3.diff
Description: Binary data