[vdr] Re: idea for jump function improvements

[René Bartsch <rene@bartschnet.de>]

What abaout hh:mm:ss? Would fit any case if possible ...


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marcus Kuba" <marcus@kuba4u.de>
To: <vdr@linuxtv.org>
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:38 PM
Subject: [vdr] Re: idea for jump function improvements


> 20.12.2001 22:23:21, s.huelswitt@gmx.de (Stefan Huelswitt) wrote:
> 
> >On 20 Dec 2001 Marcus Kuba <marcus@kuba4u.de> wrote:
> >
> >> jump-function in the MP3-part would not be in hours:mins, but in mins:secs. 
> 
> >Actually it is hh:mm :-)
> 
> Yes.. I know... that's why I wrote 'not' ! I'd prefer mm:ss, because mp3's are much shorter 
> than movies and minutes are rather inaccurate. Compared to a movie it would be the 
> same if one could only jump in 15-minute-intervals.
> A typical movie is between 90 an 120 minutes long, so you have 90-120 places where 
> you can jump with minutes. A typical song is around 5 minutes or even less, so you can 
> only jump to 4 or 5 places in the song. With seconds you could jump to 300 places.
> Currently I have 2001 mp3's on my harddisk and NONE of them is 60 minutes or longer.. 
> so I think that the hh:mm-scheme is not very useful. In fact, you could remove the hh-field 
> because its very unlikely that anyone will ever need it.
> 
> Greetings,   Marcus
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>