Mailing List archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[vdr] Re: CI Support layer
Stefan,
ok, I have 4 cards so there is no such problem.
Sorry,
Emil
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:54:48 +0100, Stefan.Hagendorn@lindy.cc wrote:
> @Axel One Card ..
>
> @Emil
> There is a well known
> "can't-decode-another-encrypted-channels-after-replay" Only the one where
> you started is still viewable ...
>
> On Systems with more then one card this problem usualy doesn't appear
> because the card which does the replay is NOT the card with the CI
> connected !!!
>
> Stefan
>
>
>
>
> Emil Naepflein <Emil.Naepflein@philosys.de>
> Sent by: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org
> 25.01.2002 06:15
> Please respond to vdr
>
>
> To: vdr@linuxtv.org
> cc:
> Subject: [vdr] Re: CI Support layer
>
>
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 21:28:42 +0100, Stefan.Hagendorn@lindy.cc wrote:
>
> > What does this mean ... the functions are available in the source code
> of
> > the public available driver .. but the matching changes in the firmware
> > are not available to the public ???
> >
> > OK .. if it is still unclear if the cam function will made it to the
> > publich, it would be nice just to fix this one nasty bug ... we don't
> > really need the fancy cam menu thingie ... but we like to look encrypted
>
> > channels (channels we pay for of course) after a replay session ....
>
> I don't know what problems you have with your CAM. I have a 4.6SE
> together with my PW subscription card and it works almost fine.
> Sure there are sometimes problems with channel decoding when I switch to
> it every several weeks, but that's all. I always assumed it has
> something to do with transfer mode. I do PW recordings and viewing
> several times a week. In the last few months I had never a recording
> that failed.
>
> May be you have this heat/oscilator CAM problem that was reported long
> time ago. The fix was to add a resistor. My CAM always worked fine.
>
> Emil
>
>
>
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index