[vdr] Re: Cuting results in 0Byte 001.vdr

[Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@cadsoft.de>]

Florian Steinel wrote:
> 
> I use vdr 1.0.1 AIO 24.04.
> original-dir/2002-01-11.20:03.50.50.rec
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root     287764738 Apr 24 21:47 001.vdr
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root     612515469 Apr 14 20:53 002.vdr
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root        461816 Apr 28 12:25 index.vdr
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root            33 Apr 28 13:01 marks.vdr
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root             4 Apr 28 13:05 resume.vdr
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root           438 Apr 14 20:27 summary.vdr
> 
> 001.vdr and 002.vdr are copied together and index.vdr is generated by
> genindex.
> 
> Cuting this recorting results in a 0 Byte 001.vdr in the
> %original-dir/2002-01-11.20:03.50.50.rec dir.

Why do you need to copy the files together first?

Does it work if you _don't_ copy them together?

Klaus
-- 
_______________________________________________________________

Klaus Schmidinger                       Phone: +49-8635-6989-10
CadSoft Computer GmbH                   Fax:   +49-8635-6989-40
Hofmark 2                               Email:   kls@cadsoft.de
D-84568 Pleiskirchen, Germany           URL:     www.cadsoft.de
_______________________________________________________________