Mailing List archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[vdr] Re: AW: Re: vdradmin & apache
You say that apache + mod_php would be complex?
If you compiled vdr then you will be able to compile apache & php a hundred
times ...!!
Itæ„€ _very_ simple!
Mfg
Marcel
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Koch [SMTP:no-return@gmx.net]
> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 14:02
> To: vdr@linuxtv.org
> Subject: [vdr] Re: AW: Re: vdradmin & apache
>
>
> Am Freitag den, 8. Februar 2002, um 16:13, schrieb Matthias Weingart:
>
> > I think in the current state - vdradmin needs to be running all the time
> > (autotimer!) so a passive (not ever running) cgi script is not possible.
> > Installing a full apache is overkill for a small system, but with
> > "top" I
> > see that vdradmin needs 15MB of RAM! (why?) The apache only 3MB.
> > (this was yesterday, today it has 19MB - maybe a memory leak in perl?)
> > [This is perl, v5.6.0 built for i586-linux]
>
> vdradmin gets the EPG data from vdr, parse this info and store this in a
> internal tree. This needs much time (approx 4 seconds on a p200,
> depending
> on how much EPG data vdr provides. More channels, more EPG data).
> vdradmin
> caches this data, because no one is willing to wait 5 or more seconds
> on a
> request (especially me). This is the reason why vdradmin needs so much
> memmory.
>
> vdradmin's goal is to be so easy it can be. I think installing Apache,
> setting up mod_perl or mod_php, installing the necessary Librarys
> is overkill and too much complex.
>
> But, i agree with you, 19MB is a bit heavy. I will look into this.
>
> Ciao, Thomas
>
>
If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer
statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/
or contact the sender
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index