Mailing List archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[vdr] Re: OT: 149 GB Maxtor disks.
- To: <vdr@linuxtv.org>
- Subject: [vdr] Re: OT: 149 GB Maxtor disks.
- From: "Bernd Hoose" <bernd@hoose.de>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 09:44:19 +0200
- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
- Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
- Content-type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"
- Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
- Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org
- Thread-index: AcIY9XVJTqxybUABQDuvvMVBK8UY3QAAbQiQ
- Thread-topic: [vdr] Re: OT: 149 GB Maxtor disks.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: news@jstriegel.de [mailto:news@jstriegel.de]
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:18 AM
> To: vdr@linuxtv.org
> Subject: [vdr] Re: OT: 149 GB Maxtor disks.
>
>
> >Using 2.4.18 from kernel.org with the xfs patch from
> http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download.html
>
> Made it on debian with the 2.4.18 kernel patches for xfs.
> Worked on first try perfectly.
>
> >xfs can use quota, you need to make the fileprogs completely then you
> also have
> many usefull things for xfs.
>
> Yes, you also have the chance to do 'isochronous' transfers
> via xfs. Didn't try that.
Me too
>
> c't said that xfs doesn't have the problem with interruption
> of the stream when transferring large data to and from disk
> (reiserfs seems to have problems with it while re-managing
> it's trees). But on my debian with xfs I've got also
> interruptions: transfer rate is very high until the buffers
> seem to be full. Then the rate drops down to almost zero for
> a couple of seconds, and then it is high again. This is also
> true for data rates that are approx. the half of 'full speed'.
> Known problem?
Dont know the full speed, at my system transferrates are +-1 the same
under xfs reiser or ext3
bernd
>
> Juergen
>
>
>
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index