[vdr] Re: AW: Re: Allwell Set-Top-Box ordering

["Rene Bartsch" <vdr@bartschnet.de>]

What about using vdradmin for maintaining timers ...

Rene

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerhard Andreas (RtW1/WIR1) *" <Andreas.Gerhard2@de.bosch.com>
To: <vdr@linuxtv.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 11:20 AM
Subject: [vdr] AW: Re: Allwell Set-Top-Box ordering


> Hello,
>
> actually I was thinking less complicated: only replaying already saved
> VDR-recordings, recorded with an extra VDR-server, via the DBox2 (internal
> 10Mbit should suffice just so, no?). So VDR itself is not needed for
DBox2,
> but MPlayer for replay of .vdr-files and some way to access the storage
> drive.
>
> Maybe also some way to edit a "Recordings-To-Do"-list for VDR on the
> VDR-server, if one would want to do this via DBox2 as well.
>
> Comments welcome :-)
>
> Andreas
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Rene Bartsch [mailto:vdr@bartschnet.de]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. September 2002 18:30
> An: vdr@linuxtv.org
> Betreff: [vdr] Re: Allwell Set-Top-Box ordering
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Micha" <mt@thalmann.de>
> To: <vdr@linuxtv.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 6:06 PM
> Subject: [vdr] Re: Allwell Set-Top-Box ordering
>
>
> > am 18.09.2002 17:27 Uhr schrieb Rene Bartsch unter vdr@bartschnet.de:
> >
> >
> > > Neutrino is - if I did understand well - nothing other
> > > than a linux-distro desinged for the D-box2.
> >
> > right.
> >
> > > So we only need support for the D-box2-tuner in the Convergence-driver
> > > and a output-plugin for the D-box2 (?? Framebuffer ??)
> >
> > That seems to be much! work.
>
> You could start with a output-plugin for framebuffer/OSS using libavcodec
to
> decode the MPEG. The worst problem will be the rendering of the OSD.
> I can't do that myself as I'm no C-programmer.
> When I've get rid of doctors having a lot of diagnosis but no clue, I'll
dig
> into C/C++.
>
> Next step would be to integrate the Neutrino-tuner-drivers into the
> Convergence-driver (with some kind of wrapper).
>
> >
> > > It's no job for the Neutrino but for the VDR-developers.
> >
> > right.
> >
> > > We also need software-decoding for the people having low-budgets.
> >
> > right, but waiting for someone else porting something is not the right
> > solution. If they will do it, ok, but don't hold your breath for
> 'ungelegte
> > Eier' ;-). Then you could also wait for the long announced and never
> > delivered dream-box on http://dream-multimedia.tv .
> >
> > Sorry for my hard words, but being on the neutrino website
> > http://dbox2.elxsi.de and reading the intro page must have had a bad
> > influence on me today. I would rather stay away from these 'developers'
as
> > far as I could.
> >
>
> I think that harsh words on their site are only about the black sheeps
> bothering the developers.
> We could also use every Linux-PPC-distro (only the HW-drivers are needed).
>
>
>
>