Mailing List archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[vdr] Re: Dual recording happend - should only have been one !? and errors on rep
- To: <vdr@linuxtv.org>
- Subject: [vdr] Re: Dual recording happend - should only have been one !? and errors on rep
- From: "Christian Jacobsen" <christian.jacobsen@stageholding.de>
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 09:20:21 +0200
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
- Content-type: text/plain;charset="US-ASCII"
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <fc.8f1c5aa28f1c5aa2a25a1c8f3b9aca00.4a0856@stageholding.de>
- Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
- Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org
Hallo,
> >> Somehow VDR started TWO recordings (timers) at the same time recording
> >the
> If there are two timers with identically data (or identically except the
> channel) vdr records these into one mixed recording. This is because of
> the name of the recording directory which in such cases will be used by
> both timers.
> I mentioned this some months ago and IIRC the plan was to change the way
> vdr names the recording directorys in a future version of vdr.
>
> I assume in your case it was a combination of this problem and the
> problem with the keys of your remote control or lirc.
>
OK, I am looking into that - and we will then see if it happens again :)
> >> Btw. was does the "-- MARK --" entries in syslog mean (also
> see below) ?
>
> They tell you that the engine, that writes the log, is still alive, even
> if there were no entry for a specific time.
>
> TMJ
> http://sdb.suse.de/de/sdb/html/js_syslog.html (only german)
> -- randy
Thanks to both of you for pointing this out to me :)
Greetings
Christian
--
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to listar@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index