[vdr] Re: vdr cuts recordings with ugly artifacts at cutting-points

[Jörg Knitter <joerg.knitter@gmx.de>]

> Oliver Endriss wrote:
> > Using my test recording I compared with cutter2 and found no
> > difference at all. Maybe I don't have a test case for the problem
you
> > tried to fix. I'll do lots of cuts the next few days and I'll try
> > both versions.
> 
> Here are my test results:
> I cut more than 10 movies using both cutter2 and patched cutter2-exp.
> Then I compared the results and could not see/hear any difference.
> Both work fine.
> 
> There are *no* visible artefacts at the cutting points anymore. The
> audio issues are more complicated and should be addressed after 1.2.0.
> 
> As I suggested before, cutter2 should be added to vdr!

I did find the time to try the patches but as far as I followed this
thread, audio packets are being deleted around cut points. When I want
to make a DVD etc. I don´t want this audio drops.
In the past, I used DS.JAR for generating sync video and audio tracks
(including automated MP2 and AC3 cut) so that I could import into a DVD
authoring tool, and there were no drops. 'Wrong' frames also have been
erased by this tool.
So, what is the result when using DS.JAR (or PVAStrumento) with this VDR
files cut with cutter2 and cutter-exp? Are there these audio drops? If
it is so, I would like to see an option to switch between the 'old' and
the 'new cut mode'.

Jörg



--
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to listar@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.