Mailing List archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[vdr] Re: Filesystem pros & cons
- To: vdr@linuxtv.org
- Subject: [vdr] Re: Filesystem pros & cons
- From: Emil Naepflein <Emil.Naepflein@philosys.de>
- Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 10:05:41 +0200
- Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-reply-to: <3F479F18.3020903@efore.fi>
- Organization: PHILOSYS Software GmbH
- References: <3F479F18.3020903@efore.fi>
- Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
- Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 20:06:32 +0300, Lauri Tischler
<lauri.tischler@efore.fi> wrote:
> I've been using reiserfs for /video for sometime now,
> appears to work ok.
> Now I'm about to add some more disk into the box.
> Any pros or cons about reiserfs versus ext3 ?
I am a bit late, but may be it helps. I have recently upgraded my server
to 6 250 GB disks in Raid5 configuration. During this process I
evaluated ext3, reiserfs and xfs. For tests I used the bonnie. The
result was that ext3 was the best compromise. Reiserfs was slow on
writes but very fast on file creation/deletion. XFS had a similar
read/write speed as ext3 but was DEAD slow on file creation and
deletion. File deletion must be fast because VDRs file removal in the
background may block other actions.
I had used Reiserfs for more than 2 years. I had some file losses with
an older Reiserfs. I now switched to ext3 completely and had no problems
so far. I have disabled the fscks with tunefs.
Emil
--
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index