Mailing List archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[vdr] Re: VDR developer version 1.3.1
Martin Neuditschko wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:36:42PM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> > Martin Neuditschko wrote:
> > > Yes they are created (changed) again. Every about 1 second a message
> > > block with including one of the above written log-lines (alternating)
> > > are generated.
> > > If I kill vdr in the right moment I get a channels.conf with
> > > 682000-channels. If vdr is killed in the wrong moment the channels
> > > in the channels.conf have 682000-frequencies.
> >
> > I guess you mean 570000 here, right?
>
> Oh, my mistake. Thanks. The first frequency (which is working)
> is 570000.
>
> > So the question is whether this frequency is actually broadcast
> > in the data stream, or if VDR interprets the data wrong at some
> > place. Since I don't have cable I'm afraid you'll have to debug this
> > all by yourself.
>
> I hope the mail including the results of the vdr-1.1.x + autopid
> helps determining it.
Not much, I'm afraid.
Please go back to the original VDR/nit.c and insert the line
dsyslog("NIT: %6d %4d %4d %6d %6d", Transponder(), ts.getOriginalNetworkId(), ts.getTransportStreamId(), Frequency, SymbolRate);
in the 'case SI::CableDeliverySystemDescriptorTag' branch, right before
bool found = false;
Then make your channels.conf contain only one channel on transponder 370
(or any other one that gets overwritten) and start VDR.
Let's see what the log says now.
BTW: if you like we can continue this via PM to avoid clogging the list.
Klaus
--
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index