Mailing List archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[vdr] Re: DELT: unexpected behaviour
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Matthias Schniedermeyer (MS) wrote:
MS> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:33:07PM +0100, Sergei Haller wrote:
MS> >
MS> > so I supposed that DELT has the same behaviour. Unfortunately not:
MS>
MS> Some people think strange things.
Why strange? That's what the documentations said about DELR. It didn't say
the same about DELT, so I did never blame on DELT for deleting (or not
deliting) the timer I wanted to delete.
MS> Two subsequend LSTRs are ALLOWED to give 2 completly different results.
yes. but I didn't do two LSTTs.
MS> In short:
MS> Don't change thing only because people don't understand what going on.
I do well understand, what's going on here. I just wanted to point out the
difference in the behaviour of the DELR/DELT commands:
lstr
...
250-30 27.10 20:10 Z TEST1
250 31 27.10 20:10 Z TEST2
delr 30
250 Recording "30" deleted
delr 31
250 Recording "31" deleted
here the recordings "Z TEST1" and "Z TEST2" were deleted.
lstt
...
250-12 1:1:27:0000:0000:99:99:test test test:
250 13 1:2:27:0000:0000:99:99:test test test:
delt 12
250 Timer "12" deleted
delt 13
501 Timer "13" not defined
delt 12
250 Timer "12" deleted
here the two timers were deleted.
c ya
Sergei
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------- -?)
eMail: Sergei.Haller@math.uni-giessen.de /\\
-------------------------------------------------------------------- _\_V
Be careful of reading health books, you might die of a misprint.
-- Mark Twain
--
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index