[vdr] Re: qestion about thread priorities-> suggestion

To: <vdr@linuxtv.org>
Subject: [vdr] Re: qestion about thread priorities-> suggestion
From: "Adrian P Challinor" <adrian.challinor@osiris.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 19:21:28 -0000
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
In-reply-to: <200402141635.30341.gfiala@s.netic.de>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@linuxtv.org?Subject=help>
List-id: vdr <vdr.mail.convergence2.de>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-unsubscribe: <https://mail.convergence2.de/cgi-bin/listen.cgi>
Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org
Thread-index: AcPzD9r0pwWJcL8OS+GepaGrrlD7bAAH7+Mg

>> IDE drives have a bad system responsivity when the full IO
>> bandwidth is used (even with UDMA enabled).
>
> That sounds as if SCSI has still an advantage here? :-(

Has anyone "played" with SATA drives as a streaming alternative to SCSI? 



Adrian



-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.

References:
- [vdr] Re: qestion about thread priorities-> suggestion
  - From: Guido Fiala <gfiala@s.netic.de>

Prev by Date: [vdr] Re: qestion about thread priorities-> suggestion
Next by Date: [vdr] Re: pls help with softdevice (undefined symbol: fast_memcpy)
Previous by thread: [vdr] Re: qestion about thread priorities-> suggestion
Next by thread: [vdr] Re: "sparse-copy" ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index