Re: [V4l2-library] Alternative idea: make a library

Thierry Merle wrote:

Hans de Goede a écrit :

...

I think you've misunderstood me, I would love for my v4l lib to be poart of the v4l-dvb tree as soon as the split discussed before is done, but I would like to see a mechanism to create separate tarballs for it for easy testing in the begin fase.

Regards,

Hans

Oops, sorry. You can add a rule in the makefile for that: tar: clean tar cvf /tmp/archive.tar * $(include_files_and_other_stuff_that_makes_an_independent_build)

Yes something like that should work just fine, a seen in my announcement post, I now have a split (and cleaned up) version of the code ready.

I would very much like this code to get included into the v4l-dvb tree, what steps are necessary for that?

Thanks & Regards,

Hans