On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 14:32 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
Grégoire Favre wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 01:59:28PM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
Personally I *hate* it when I get the same message twice.
If you use something like procmail, just add :
:0 Whc: msgid.lock | formail -D 4096 .msgid.cache
Woulnd't it just be easier to send replies *only* to the ML? After all, the original sender _is_ subscribed to the list!
Ok, let's not waste time on this discussion that has been done several times before...
Indeed, http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/listreplyto.html
Personally, I find adding a reply-to header to be preferable though.