I agree that OSD should be set to the output of the device's resolution. Not the video content it self. Would really love to see that change happen.
On 04/05/2009, Nicolas Huillard nicolas@huillard.net wrote:
Matthias Becker a écrit :
and what about anamorphic material? A 16:9 SD broadcast in fact still is 4:3 but is streached by the TV to 16:9 to look ok (no egg-heads). Wouldn't it be correct also to draw the OSD anamorphic so that is not screached by the TV?
Did you get the point? It's somehow difficult to describe this topic for
me.
With today's pixel-displays, we'd like to avoid all scaling, stretching, etc. done by the panel itself. ie. like Rolf said, always output from the computer at panel resolution, with 1:1 pixel mapping. Video would be scaled, but not the OSD.
Regards, Matthias
2009/5/4 Rolf Ahrenberg rahrenbe@cc.hut.fi:
On Mon, 4 May 2009, Falk Spitzberg wrote:
The OSD should adopt to the size of the video material. If that is scaled to some non TV screen size, the OSD is scaled by the same
factor.
I still disagree. If you scale down your OSD to video resolution (i.e. 544x576) and afterwards scale up the both video and OSD to output resolution (i.e. 1280x720), the OSD really looks crap due to scaling artefacts.
--
NH
vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr