On Dienstag 02 August 2005 09:44, Harald Milz wrote:
Klaus is correct - we'd rather find the reason for it. I have no idea where to look, though. If someone could tell me what to look for...
did you already try to send your channels.conf and epg.data to somebody else to see if it coredumps there too? If not, you could mail them to me and I would try that and debug if necessary. At least I could produce a backtrace.
On Dienstag 02 August 2005 10:29, Wolfgang Rohdewald wrote:
On Dienstag 02 August 2005 09:44, Harald Milz wrote:
Klaus is correct - we'd rather find the reason for it. I have no idea where to look, though. If someone could tell me what to look for...
did you already try to send your channels.conf and epg.data to somebody else to see if it coredumps there too? If not, you could mail them to me and I would try that and debug if necessary. At least I could produce a backtrace.
well I tried your files (you sent me two epg.data, I only tried the bigger one) and vdr handles them fine here. I even ran it with valgrind, no complaints.
You have a lot of encrypted channels in there which I cannot receive. Do you still get crashes if you only use FTA channels? (after truncating epg.data and waiting long enough of course)
Otherwise I second Udos binary search. It probably sounds like more work than it really is.
Wolfgang Rohdewald wolfgang@rohdewald.de wrote:
You have a lot of encrypted channels in there which I cannot receive. Do you still get crashes if you only use FTA channels? (after truncating epg.data and waiting long enough of course)
Having no CI, I use only the FTA channels. In the meanwhile I am using decruft to keep the channels.conf clean, there should be no encrypted channels any more. I'll clean up decruft's rules a little bit more. Is it safe to assume that vdr gets epg data only from channels that are actually in channels.conf? I guess I should use a fixed channels.conf and switch off autopid altogether. It's already at "1" ("update existing channels only", correct?).
Otherwise I second Udos binary search. It probably sounds like more work than it really is.
Yep, it's usually a 10-step operation, more or less. I'll try that tonight.